Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Round 1 bounty submission: cfi-dkgv10-r1.
What this PR does
Adds DKG Experiment Ledger, a CLI/library and Python notebook bridge for recording measured experiment runs in project-scoped Working Memory, comparing compatible metrics, and explicitly requesting Curator-authorized sealed SHARE through the public HTTP API. Records preserve source/data fingerprints and remain self-attested.
Integration links
Scope & faithfulness
dkgCLI, MCP). It does not import internal DKG packages, patch node source, or write to SPARQL directly (bypassing the assertion lifecycle / Curator).memoryLayerscorrectly reflects which layer(s) the integration touches.v10PrimitivesUsedcorrectly reflects which primitives are exercised.Security declarations (Section 8a)
security.networkEgresslists every external host the integration contacts beyond the local DKG node.security.writeAuthoritylists every DKG write operation the integration performs. Curator-authority ops (PUBLISH, SHARE, endorse, verify) are called out explicitly if used.security.credentialsHandledlists every third-party credential the installer will prompt for.preinstall/install/postinstallscripts, or the exceptions are explained insecurity.notes.npm publish --provenance) when applicable.Contributor attestation
security.networkEgress.Notes for the committee
Maintainer: @btusbefw. I commit to at least six months of maintenance after acceptance.
Validation:
npm audit signaturesverified one registry signature and one attestation.The walkthrough is an actual asciinema recording; its readable transcript is in the same demo directory. The lab used a mock chain and zero external peers. Public replication, on-chain publication, independent experiment verification and statistical significance are not claimed. The Python bridge consumes explicit records; it does not read notebook history. Remote DKG access is opt-in HTTPS, as explained in the entry's security notes.
Release/provenance run: https://github.com/btusbefw/dkg-experiment-ledger/actions/runs/34448960509
Please consider this in the high-quality integration tier, with a requested award of 5,000 TRAC. Please confirm the available Round 1 allocation and any remaining acceptance requirements. The intended payee is an existing French SASU; please confirm company onboarding, invoice requirements, payout network and timing. No award is assumed until agreed.