Skip to content

feat(query): add context and execution planning signals - #3445

Open
josephschorr wants to merge 8 commits into
authzed:mainfrom
josephschorr:qp-signal-providers-pr
Open

josephschorr wants to merge 8 commits into
authzed:mainfrom
josephschorr:qp-signal-providers-pr

Conversation

@josephschorr

@josephschorr josephschorr commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add planning signals for request-context stability, permission-check outcomes, and completed result sizes, including historical estimates that age as observations get older. These provide evidence for subsequent optimizations while keeping incomplete work distinct from completed results.

Each signal includes a short summary, examples, and tests for its estimates, revision scope, and behavior across schema changes. Validation includes race detection, generated properties, storage-budget regressions, and lint checks.

@josephschorr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Waiting for the base PR, #3444, to merge. This is a dependent draft and will be rebased after that PR lands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/tooling Affects the dev or user toolchain (e.g. tests, ci, build tools) label Oct 30, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@josephschorr josephschorr changed the title feat(query): add context and execution planning signals feat(query): add request-context and execution planning signals Oct 30, 2026
@josephschorr josephschorr changed the title feat(query): add request-context and execution planning signals feat(query): add context and execution planning signals Oct 30, 2026
@josephschorr josephschorr changed the title feat(query): add context and execution planning signals feat(query): add request-context and execution planning signals Oct 30, 2026
@josephschorr josephschorr changed the title feat(query): add request-context and execution planning signals feat(query): add context and execution planning signals Oct 30, 2026
@josephschorr
josephschorr force-pushed the qp-signal-providers-pr branch 3 times, most recently from 3a9b9b8 to ad57abe Compare October 30, 2026 19:19
@josephschorr
josephschorr force-pushed the qp-signal-providers-pr branch from ad57abe to 85983b5 Compare October 30, 2026 19:40
@josephschorr
josephschorr marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2026 19:40
@josephschorr
josephschorr requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2026 19:40

@tstirrat15 tstirrat15 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, looking forward to seeing how these integrate

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/tooling Affects the dev or user toolchain (e.g. tests, ci, build tools) Skip-Changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants