Recommend using cheaper regex

[Isti01]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Regex format guidance to recommend a pattern that accepts multiline text.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: kir-dev/cmsch/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: bf07248e-7a8f-4275-b623-147042497a00

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: kir-dev/cmsch/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 8544c3e3-5d66-45e0-80dc-680ce0bbe6c0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 086ac4c and dbf01f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• backend/src/main/resources/templates/component/details/form-editor.html

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Regex format guidance now recommends ^[\\s\\S]*$ for matching multiline text. The single-line .* example remains unchanged.

Changes

Regex Guidance

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update multiline pattern backend/src/main/resources/templates/component/details/form-editor.html	The multiline Regex example changes to ^[\\s\\S]*$. The single-line .* example is unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to dbf01

The updated example accepts LF and CRLF in form values, so no actionable merge risk was identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title describes the change: recommending a cheaper regex for multiline text.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}