Skip to content

feat: Add semconv k8s relationship rules (production) - #3345

Open
douavue wants to merge 6 commits into
newrelic:mainfrom
douavue:semconv-k8s-relationships-prod
Open

douavue wants to merge 6 commits into
newrelic:mainfrom
douavue:semconv-k8s-relationships-prod

Conversation

@douavue

@douavue douavue commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Promote the otelSemconv* relationship rules merged to staging in #3335 into the production synthesis files.

Relevant information

Api Review Board (ARB)

Pull requests with changes to this repository might need to be linked with an ARB ticket, which has to be approved before merging.

If you are an external contributor please contact New Relic Support.

What definition changes require ARB and which do not? Guide here.

If you are new to ARB process also check this.

ARB Jira ticket:
https://new-relic.atlassian.net/browse/NR-XXXX

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines and understand the acceptance criteria.
  • The value of the attribute marked as identifier will be unique and valid.
  • I've confirmed that my entity type wasn't already defined. If it is I'm providing an explanation above.
  • I've linked an ARB ticket & received approval from API Review Board in order to make these changes

Promote the otelSemconv* relationship rules merged to staging in newrelic#3335
into the production synthesis files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

@entityBot
entityBot requested a review from a team November 3, 2026 20:48
entityBot
entityBot previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2026

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

The 11 .stg.yml files now match (or, for Host, are stale against) their
production counterparts. The Job file stays: it still stages the
CONTAINS to MANAGES change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants