Add delete stale nodes command - #3593
Conversation
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
| Metric | Results |
|---|---|
| Complexity | 42 |
🟢 Coverage 0.00% diff coverage · -0.05% coverage variation
Metric Results Coverage variation ✅ -0.05% coverage variation (-1.00%) Diff coverage ✅ 0.00% diff coverage Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage Common ancestor commit (4dec190) 89111 21642 24.29% Head commit (5ff51c1) 89275 (+164) 21640 (-2) 24.24% (-0.05%) Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch:
<coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage Pull request (#3593) 164 0 0.00% Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified:
<covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%
NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
eb117d5 to
b5bfb98
Compare
f117d58 to
05628ab
Compare
|
@fschade I think the prefix might be related to some of your changes. Could you review this? |
b03e2a1 to
af9a920
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
…tion Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <jfd@butonic.de>
|
ill add a pr on top of it which allows to configure the prefix, thanks for mentioning me |
This PR fixes the delete stale nodes command to properly handle node cleanup by implementing event-driven revert operations instead of direct file system deletion. The fix ensures that stale processing nodes are properly rolled back through the event system rather than being forcefully removed.
builds on opencloud-eu/reva#821 and contains a reva bump